Research Article - (2022) Volume 10, Issue 5
KAP Survey Regarding the Basics of Orthodontics among Dental Students
Remmiya Mary Varghese* and Vamshi Ram V
*Correspondence: Remmiya Mary Varghese, Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India, Email:
Abstract
Introduction: Orthodontics is a dental speciality that focuses on the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of crooked teeth
and jaws, as well as incorrect bite patterns. It comprises the use of braces and other tools to gradually shift the teeth and
jaws.
Materials and Methods: A survey-based questionnaire was used to test dental students' knowledge of the fundamentals of
orthodontics. The Google Forms tool was used to collect a total of ten questions. This survey saw a total of 250 people take
part. The data was analysed using SPSS.
Results: The data was analysed and the results were gathered. The majority of the participants were males who were
pursuing their undergraduate degrees.
Conclusion: According to the findings, the majority of 4th year students and interns were familiar with the fundamentals of orthodontics among dentistry students.
Keywords
Awareness, Dental students, Knowledge, Orthodontics, innovative survey
Introduction
Orthodontics is a dental specialty that focuses on correcting malocclusions. According to the American Association of Orthodontics, about half of the population has malocclusions. Many people have teeth that are crowded or crooked. The teeth will be straightened or moved into a better place with orthodontic therapy [1,2]. This can improve the appearance of the teeth and the way they bite together, as well as make them easier to clean [3]. Malocclusion of the teeth is when your teeth are misaligned [4]. This can lead to oral health complications if left untreated [5]. Treatment can improve the appearance of the teeth, but it canal Treatment not only improves the appearance of the teeth, but it can also improve chewing and speech performance and, in some situations, help preserve teeth from damage or decay [6,7]. The orthodontist uses a variety of medical dental equipment, like as headgear, plates, and braces, to achieve these aims [8].
Orthodontic treatment, like any other medical treatment, comes with its own set of complications [9]. To ensure that each patient receives a net profit from care, the clinician must consider how these risks apply to them from an ethical perspective [10]. Failure to adequately define and handle the risks associated with orthodontic care can result in both patient dissatisfaction and legal action [11]. Periodontal disease, pain, root resorption, temporomandibular disorder, caries, speech disorders, and enamel damage are all complications of orthodontic treatment [12]. Since no two patients or orthodontic procedures are ever alike in any way, determining whether care can result in a net profit must be done on a case-by-case basis [13,14]. The study's aim is to assess dentistry students' understanding, awareness, and perceptions of orthodontic therapy.
Materials And Methods
During this study, a convenient sample size of 200 consecutive respondents was used. A cross-sectional online observational study with dichotomous response and multiple choice questions was conducted using Google forms. The Institutional Ethical Committee gave its moral approval to the project. The questionnaire covers nine questions about dental students' knowledge, awareness, and perceptions about orthodontic therapy.
Statistical analysisThe data was gathered and entered into an excel spreadsheet, which was then fed into the SPSS software for statistical analysis. A descriptive analysis was performed, and the Chi-square test was used to determine data correlation.
Results And Discussion
The data was analysed and the results were obtained. The survey form was completed by 250 students in total. The majority of the participants were males who were pursuing their undergraduate degrees. The majority of 4th year students and interns were more knowledgeable about orthodontics than others, followed by 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year students and interns. The difference, however, is statistically significant. (Chi-square value-10.105, p value-0.120 (>0.05) hence significant) (Figure1).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/920b7/920b7b17ba3d4e6aa9b7d4407def3048de5af3a8" alt="journal-research-bar journal-research-bar"
Figure 1: A bar graph depicting the relationship between the participants' year of study and their awareness of orthodontics. The X-axis represents the study year, and the Y-axis shows the number of participants, with beige representing the correction of malposition teeth and jaws, green representing the restoration of decaying teeth, and blue representing bleeding gums. The majority of 4th year students and interns were more knowledgeable about orthodontics than others, followed by 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year students and interns. The difference, however, is statistically significant. (Chi-square value-10.105, p value-0.120 (>0.05) hence significant).
The majority of 4th year students and interns were more knowledgeable about the primary radiograph required for orthodontic treatment than the others, followed by 1st, 3rd, and 4th year students and interns. The difference, however, is statistically significant. (Chi-square value-7.193, p value-0.584 (>0.05) hence significant) (Figure 2).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/087a8/087a869f6f6081edc3de6f4cfaaed068d2548866" alt="journal-research-bar journal-research-bar"
Figure 2: The bar graph depicts the relationship between the participant’s year of study and their awareness of the primary radiograph required for orthodontic treatment. The X-axis represents the research year, and the Y-axis shows the number of participants, with purple indicating RVG, beige indicating OPG, green indicating cephalometric X-rays, and blue indicating all of the above. The majority of 4th year students and interns, followed by 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year students and interns, were more aware of the primary radiograph required for orthodontic treatment than others. The difference, however, is statistically significant. (Chi-square value-7.193, p value-0.584 (>0.05) hence significant)
Children and adolescents have been the subjects of the vast majority of studies on the need for orthodontic treatment [15-16]. Children self-perceived a greater treatment need than was professionally assessed on aesthetic grounds in questionnaire-based investigations [17]. However, the demand for orthodontic treatment in children is difficult to predict, and it will fluctuate dramatically as they become older [18-19]. Furthermore, an older adult's self-perception of treatment needs may differ from the treatment needs assessed by orthodontic experts [20]. Adults, according to many authors, consistently underestimate the ultimate treatment required in terms of dental health [21]. Participants believed that orthodontic treatment would not improve their mastication, speaking, or job chances [22-23]. Patients and parents expected orthodontic treatment to improve mastication, speech, and future occupational success, according to Shaw et al [24].
The current study has significant limitations, such as the limited sample size of the study population (only 200 individuals). We could raise awareness and educate people about the fundamentals of orthodontics. Our team has a wealth of research and knowledge that has resulted in high-quality publications [25-45] (Table 1).
Table 1: The differences between the P value of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year students and interns.
Responses | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUESTIONS | CHOICES | 1st year | 2nd year | 3rd year | 4th year | Interns | P-VALUE |
Cephalometric X-rays | 23 | 23 | 24 | 20 | 20 | ||
RVG | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | ||
OPG | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||
Primary radiograph | All the above | 21 | 20 | 21 | 24 | 24 | 0.106 |
Copper NiTi | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 4 | ||
NiTi | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | ||
Stainless steel | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
Type of material | All the above | 35 | 36 | 36 | 38 | 38 | 0.025 |
Zinc phosphate | 42 | 41 | 44 | 44 | 43 | ||
Eugenol | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | ||
Cement | Zinc Oxide | 4 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0.067 |
Yes | 40 | 36 | 34 | 36 | 37 | ||
No | 8 | 12 | 14 | 11 | 11 | ||
Medication | Maybe | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0.032 |
Yes | 43 | 40 | 41 | 44 | 42 | ||
Oral prophylaxis | No | 6 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 6 | |
Maybe | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0.012 | |
Mastication | 38 | 36 | 35 | 37 | 37 | ||
Quality of life | 5 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | ||
Self esteem | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | ||
Malocclusion | Speech | 5 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 0.024 |
Yes | 35 | 37 | 35 | 36 | 36 | ||
No | 8 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 | ||
Habits | Maybe | 7 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 0.005 |
1-5 months | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 3 | ||
>3 years | 5 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 4 | ||
6- 36 months | 37 | 35 | 37 | 39 | 40 | ||
Duration of treatment | <1 month | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0.011 |
5-7 years | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | ||
8-10 years | 38 | 36 | 35 | 37 | 38 | ||
Age of treatment | 10-12 years | 5 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 5 | |
13-14 years | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 0.058 |
Conclusion
The present study thus concluded that the dental students who were studying 4th year and interns were aware of the basics of orthodontics. In that way the current study believed that this work would cause awareness about the basics of orthodontics.
Acknowledgement
This research was done under the supervision of the Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha dental College and Hospital. We sincerely show gratitude to the corresponding guide who provided insight and expertise that greatly assisted the research.
Source Of Funding
The present study was supported by the following agencies.
- Saveetha Dental college & Hospitals
- Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University
- Vasutha Industries, Chennai, Tamilnadu.
Conflict Of Interest
There was no potential conflict of interest.
References
- Janson G, Valarelli F.Open-Bite Malocclusion: Treatment and Stability. Wiley-Blackwell. 2014.
- Ngan PW, Deguchi T, Roberts EW, et al. Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion. Bentham Science Publishers, United State. 2014.
- Patti A, D’Arc GP. Clinical Success in Early Orthodontic Treatment. Quintessence International Editeur, France. 2019.
- Balachandran P, Janakiram C. ‘Prevalence of malocclusion among 8-15 years old children, India - A systematic review and meta-analysis’. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2021; 11:192–199.
- Angle EH. Treatment of Malocclusion of the Teeth: Angle’s System. Greatly Enl. and Entirely Rewritten, with Six Hundred and Forty-one Illustrations. (7th Edition) Philadelphia SS. White dental manufacturing Co, USA. 1907.
- Ravaghi V, Kavand G, Farrahi N, et al. ‘Malocclusion, Past Orthodontic Treatment, And Satisfaction With Dental Appearance Among Canadian Adults’, J Can Dent Assoc2015;81:13
- Wichelhaus A. Orthodontic Therapy: Fundamental Treatment Concepts. Stuttgart, New York.
- Griffiths SE, Jonathan Sandler P. ‘Tooth reshaping as an integral part of orthodontic treatment’, Ortho Up 2014; 118–120.
- Sioustis IA. ‘Salivary Metalloproteinase-8 and Metalloproteinase-9 Evaluation in Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment before and after Periodontal Therapy’, Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18:1583.
- Riveracircuns A, Tulloch J. ‘Gingival invagination in extraction sites of orthodontic patients: Their incidence, effects on periodontal health, and orthodontic treatment’, Am J Orthod 1983; 469–476.
- Singh P. ‘Adult orthodontic patients in primary care and their motivation for seeking treatment’, Orthodontic Update 2016; 69–72.
- Brusamolino F. ‘Periodontal management of gingival recession during orthodontic treatment in a Cleft Lip and Palate patient’.
- Han JY. ‘A comparative study of combined periodontal and orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and clear aligners in patients with periodontitis’. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2015; 45:193-204.
- Guo R. ‘Salivary microbiome and periodontal status of patients with periodontitis during the initial stage of orthodontic treatment’. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2021; 159:644-652.
- Circuns ALR, Rivera Circuns AL, Camilla Tulloch JF, et al. ‘Gingival invagination in extraction sites of orthodontic patients: Their incidence, effects on periodontal health, and orthodontic treatment’, Am J Orthod 1983; 469–476.
- Zovko R. ‘The prevalence of orthodontic treatment needs of school children in northern Herzegovina’, Acta Med Acad 2017; 27–33.
- Hassan A, Hassan M, Lenajwi A, et al. ‘Association of orthodontic treatment needs and oral health-related quality of life in Saudi children seeking orthodontic treatment’, Patient Preference and Adherence 2014; 1571-1579.
- Janu A. ‘Periodontal Procedures adjunct to Orthodontic Treatment’, Ortho J Nepal 2015; 42–45.
- Harfin J. ‘Early Treatment of Periodontal Problems in Children’. Clini OrthoTreat 2017; 67–79.
- Al-Khalifa KS. ‘Comparison of orthodontic treatment need among professionals and parents in Dammam, Saudi Arabia’. Niger J Clin Pract 2021; 24:161–167.
- Chien YJA, Yin-jung, Chien A, et al. ‘Adjunctive orthodontic treatment of pathologically migrated incisors in adults with periodontitis’.
- Shapiro HH. ‘The muscles of mastication. Their relation to problems in orthodontic treatment’. Int J Orthod Dent Child 1934;12–17.
- Anu V, Madan Kumar PD Shivakumar M, et al. ‘Salivary flow rate, pH and buffering capacity in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment - A prospective study’, India J Dent Res 2019; 30:527–530.
- Shaw A. ‘Dimensional changes in height of labial alveolar bone of proclined lower incisor after lingual positioning by orthodontic treatment: A cephalometric study on adult Bengali population’. Contemp Clin Dent 2015; 6:31–34.
- Felicita AS. ‘Orthodontic extrusion of Ellis Class VIII fracture of maxillary lateral incisor - The sling shot method’. Saudi Dent J 2018; 30:265–269.
- Chandrasekar R. ‘Development and validation of a formula for objective assessment of cervical vertebral bone age’, Prog Orthod 2020; 21:38.
- Arvind PTR, Jain RK. ‘Skeletally anchored forsus fatigue resistant device for correction of Class II malocclusions-A systematic review and meta-analysis’, Orthod Craniofac Res 2021; 24:52–61.
- Khan A (2021) Metal-Organic Frameworks for Chemical Reactions: From Organic Transformations to Energy Applications. Elsevier.
- Alam MK. ‘Sagittal Jaw Relationship of Different Types of Cleft and Non-cleft Individuals’. Front Pediatr 2021; 9:651951.
- Marya A, Venugopal A. ‘The Use of Technology in the Management of Orthodontic Treatment-Related Pain’. Pain Res Manag 2021;
- Adel S. ‘Robotic Applications in Orthodontics: Changing the Face of Contemporary Clinical Care’, Biomed Res Int 2021; 9954615.
- Sivakumar A. ‘A Comparison of Craniofacial Characteristics between Two Different Adult Populations with Class II Malocclusion-A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study’, Biology 2021; 10:438.
- Venugopal A, Vaid N, Bowman SJ, et al. ‘Outstanding, yet redundant? After all, you may be another Choluteca Bridge!’ Semin Orthod 2021; 27:53–56.
- Gopalakrishnan U. ‘Assessing the Potential Association Between Microbes and Corrosion of Intra-Oral Metallic Alloy-Based Dental Appliances Through a Systematic Review of the Literature’. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021; 9:154.
- Venugopal A, Vaid N, Bowman SJ, et al. ‘The quagmire of collegiality vs. competitiveness’, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2021;159:553–555.
- Marya A. ‘Risk Perception of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Implementation of Various Protective Measures by Dentists Across Various Countries’, Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:5848.
- Ramesh A. ‘Comparative estimation of sulfiredoxin levels between chronic periodontitis and healthy patients - A case-control study’. J Periodontol 2018;89:1241–1248.
- Duraisamy R. ‘Compatibility of Nonoriginal Abutments With Implants: Evaluation of Microgap at the Implant-Abutment Interface, With Original and Nonoriginal Abutments’, Implant Dent 2019;28:289–295.
- Ezhilarasan D, Apoorva VS, Ashok Vardhan N, et al. ‘Syzygium cumini extract induced reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptosis in human oral squamous carcinoma cells’, J Oral Pathol Med 2019; 48:115–121.
- Arumugam P, George R, Jayaseelan VP, et al. ‘Aberrations of m6A regulators are associated with tumorigenesis and metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma’, Arch Oral Biol 2021; 122:105030.
- Joseph B, Prasanth CS. ‘Is photodynamic therapy a viable antiviral weapon against COVID-19 in dentistry?’ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2021; 118–119.
- Gothandam K. ‘Antioxidant potential of theaflavin ameliorates the activities of key enzymes of glucose metabolism in high fat diet and streptozotocin - induced diabetic rats’, Redox Rep 2019; 24:41–50.
- Ezhilarasan D. ‘Hepatotoxic potentials of methotrexate: Understanding the possible toxicological molecular mechanisms’, Toxicol 2021; 458:152840.
- Preethi KA, Auxzilia Preethi K, Sekar D, et al. ‘Dietary microRNAs: Current status and perspective in food science’. J Food Biochem 2021; 45:13827.
- Yin L. ‘Research progress of orthodontic treatment and periodontal health’. Conf Proce 2019; 2058:020036.
Author Info
Remmiya Mary Varghese* and Vamshi Ram V
1Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, IndiaCitation: Remmiya Mary Varghese, Vamshi Ram V, kap survey regarding the basics of orthodontics among dental students,J Research Med Dent Sci, 2022, 10 (5):198-202.
Received: 22-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. JRMDS-22-48782; , Pre QC No. JRMDS-22-48782; Editor assigned: 25-Feb-2022, Pre QC No. JRMDS-22-48782; Reviewed: 11-Mar-2022, QC No. JRMDS-22-48782; Revised: 25-Apr-2022, Manuscript No. JRMDS-22-48782; Published: 02-May-2022