GET THE APP

Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Case Control Study

Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science
eISSN No. 2347-2367 pISSN No. 2347-2545

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research - (2022) Volume 10, Issue 2

Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Case Control Study

Muhammad Amjad Kalhoro1*, Mehwish Abrar2, Shahtaj Adil Shah3, Safia Bano4, Nisar Ahmed Khokhar5 and Mahesh Kumar6

*Correspondence: Muhammad Amjad Kalhoro, Assistant Professor Medicine, Bilawal Medical College Jamshoro, Pakistan, Email:

Author info »

Abstract

Aim: To explore the incidence of cognitive impairment in individual having Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Study Design: Case control study. Place and duration: Bilawal Medical College Jamshoro Pakistan, from rom September 2019 to September 2020. Methodology: Total 31 female patients with neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (nSLE) and thirty-one cognitively healthy women with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (Control group) participated in the study. The researchers employed single-photon emission computed tomography to obtain information on sociodemographic, clinical, neuropsychological, & SLE-related markers. Results: When it came to cognitive complaints, 22.6 percent of those with nSLE reported them, compared to 6.5 percent in the control group (p=0.147); the frequency of cognitive dysfunction was 32.3 percent in those with nSLE, compared to 6.5 percent in the control group (p=0.01). Overall, the nSLE group seemed to be impaired in all cognitive domains at the same level, and there were correlations between cognitive dysfunction and less skilled occupation (r=0.41; p=0.02). Conclusion: In nSLE, cognitive impairment is rather common, and it seems to have a detrimental impact on social functioning. A number of interconnected elements (such as SLE-related factors, drugs, and psychosocial factors) seem to have a role in cognitive impairment and cognitive complaints in nSLE patients.

Keywords

Cognitive dysfunction, Systemic lupus erythromatosis, Prevalence

Introduction

SLE is a chronic autoimmune illness that manifests itself in a variety of ways and may affect almost every organ in the body [1]. Stroke, convulsions, migraine, psychosis, and cognitive decline are all symptoms of systemic lupus erythematosus, and they are all classed as neuropsychiatric (NP) symptoms, according to the American Academy of Neuropsychiatry. Neuropsychiatric disorders are known to affect 14 percent to 75 percent of people with SLE [2-4].

In SLE, the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric dysfunction is unknown. Immune-mediated vascular disease and antibodies against neurological tissue are two widely hypothesized disease pathways [5,6]. Distinct pathogenic pathways might be involved in different neuropsychiatric symptoms of SLE.

Several studies have shown that autoantibody activity and cerebral ischemia may play a role in cognitive impairment in SLE, with autoantibody activity and cerebral ischemia both being mentioned [7]. A number of other factors, including health parameters (illness duration, disease activity, and medication use), immunological activity (proinflammatory cytokines), and behavioural variables, have also been proposed [8]. Anti-DNA antibodies that cross react with certain regions on the ligand binding domain of NR2 receptors, especially NR2a and NR2b, have been postulated to have a role [9,10].

There is a large concentration of these receptors in the hippocampus, which has an effect on learning and memory. Another kind of antibody connected to cognitive impairment is the ACL (anticardiolipin antibody). Additional antibodies related to cognitive problems include the antineuronal antibody, the anti-endothelial cell antibody (AECA), and the anti-Nedd5 C-ter antibody [11]. When compared to patients without neuropsychiatric symptoms, individuals with neuropsychiatric symptoms of systemic lupus erythematosus exhibited significantly higher levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in both blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [12, 13].

In 21–81 percent of SLE patients, cognitive impairment develops [14,15]. Variations in the frequency of cognitive dysfunction might be attributable to differences in research groups, cognitive function assessment methodologies, and cognitive impairment criteria. Patients with both ongoing and resolved CNS illness, as well as those with no history of CNS symptoms, have been shown to have cognitive impairment [16-18].

Deficits in cognition have been identified in the areas of verbal and visual information processing, attention, verbal and visual speed, verbal productivity, and visuospatial memory [17,19,20]. Because these anomalies are not restricted to a particular brain location or cognitive domain, it is possible that these findings represent an amalgamation of people who have a range of neuropsychiatric symptoms. When it comes to neuropsychological testing, patients who have had a right parietal stroke, for example, would perform much differently from those who have had seizures in the left temporal lobe [21].

Although cognitive impairment has been documented in 27–52 percent of SLE patients with current or previous severe neuropsychiatric symptoms (nSLE), it has also been found in 20–42 percent of SLE patients who have never showed such signs. Cognitive impairment has usually been classified as ‘subclinical' in this category.

Specifically, the goal of this study was to investigate the prevalence, frequency, and intensity of cognitive complaints, and cognitive impairment, in females with nSLE.

Methodology

Total 62 women with SLE [22] were selected from a hospital-based rheumatology outpatient clinic after giving their informed permission. Total 31 women were in case group having neuropsychiatric SLE, while 31 women were in control group (women having SLE but no neuropsychiatric complaints). In this study, participants were between the ages of 20 and 49, and they did not have any present or recent history of SLE-related neuropsychiatric symptoms other than mild cognitive impairment, headache, anxiety, or mood disturbances [23]. Thirty-one females were matched to nSLE patients based on their age and educational level. They were chosen from medical Centre or hospital staff (55 percent), neurology clinic patients (with main headache and syncope; 23 percent), and the researchers' acquaintances and colleagues (23 percent) In the control group, there were no substantial cognitive complaints, and they did not have a history of medical, neurological, or psychiatric issues that would have influenced their cognition in the past.

By a senior neurologist who specializes in behavioural neurology, a semi-structured neuropsychiatric interview as well as a neurological evaluation were done. Questions concerning cognitive problems were asked, as well as a search for present and previous psychiatric illnesses. If the inclusion criteria were met after the neuropsychiatric evaluation, a neuropsychologist (I.C.) performed a neuropsychological test without knowing any clinical or preclinical data other than the SLE diagnosis. It was a 90- minute battery that followed the guidelines of the American College of Rheumatology's ad hoc committee.

To be classified as having cognitive dysfunction, a subject had to perform below the 5th percentile in at least two cognitive tests as compared to the control group, regardless of whether or not they reported cognitive complaints. Because 6.5 percent of the control females were classified as cognitively impaired under this idea, and because they were using their own knowledge as a reference, two altered scores were utilized rather than one in the analysis of the results.

A comparison was made between the two study groups, as well as between the cognitively normal and cognitively impaired nSLE subgroups, and between the two study groups, based on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. In this investigation, the two-sided Student and Mann-Whitney tests, as well as two additional tests, were used. It was observed that there were plausible associations between cognitive complaints and cognitive impairment in the nSLE group after assessing the bivariate Spearman rank coefficients. There were two dependent variables chosen: cognitive complaints (yes or no) and cognitive dysfunction (number of altered cognitive scores). Age and educational level were included as extra factors. Further research on components with a correlation coefficient larger than 0.2 was conducted using the regression analysis approach.

Results

One of the women in the control group had a modest anxiety illness that did not affect cognition. Patients with nSLE had more current psychiatric problems and a history of headache than controls, and there was a tendency toward more frequent cognitive symptoms (Table 1). Attention/concentration/speed of thinking (2 females), memory (1 female), orientation (1 female), and language (1 female) issues, or a combination of the above, were characterized as cognitive deficits in nSLE patients (4 women).

  nSLE (n= 31 ) Control (n= 31) P
Age ( years) 32.2 35.5 0.542
Education (%)     1
Primary 19.4 19.4  
Intermediate 48.4 48.4  
University 33.3 33.3  
Occupation     0.677
Unemployed 0 4.3  
Unskilled 25.7 26.1  
Skilled worker 51.5 52.6  
Professional 22.5 17.3  
Cognitive complaints (%) 22.5 6.5 0.146
History of headache 54.8 29 0.039
Anxiety 6.9 5.7 0.176
Depression 3.5 2.7 0.323
Psychiatric conditions
Present (%) 25.7 3.2 0.026

Table 1: Socio-demographic and clinical features of the two study groups.

Five subjects had a few cognitive scores that were not recorded (3 nSLE and 2 control women). Ten individuals with nSLE had cognitive impairment, accounting for 32.1 percent of the total.

With regard to cognitively impaired nSLE patients' altered tasks and domains, each patient demonstrated a distinct pattern of dysfunction (Table 2).

Domain Task nSLE Control group P-value % altered nSLE
 Task Domain
Mental status MMSE 18.3+ 28.9 0.104 6.5 6.5
Attention Digital span backward, 4.2 4.5 0.143 3.3 25.8
 Digital span forward 5.7 6 0.252 0
Memory Immediate recall 48.8 53.4 0.028 6.5 19.4
Delay recall 10 10.9 0.197 9.7
Delay recognition 12.8 13.6 0.104 12.8
Visuospatial processing Complex figure 33.4 34.2 0.16 6.5 9.7
Copy box design 4.8 5.2 0.094 6.5
Language Verbal comprehension 8.5 8.8 0.096 10
Visual verbal naming 41.6 41.8 0.267 3.3 22.6
Reasoning TONI 20.8 24 0.19 3.2
Arithmetic problem 6.4 7.1 0.176 6.7 9.7
Psychomotor speed Digital symbol substitution 36.5 38.7 0.33 6.5 19.4
Stroop words 99.7 106.7 0.105 10.3
Stroop colors 69.3 73.3 0.19 17.2

Table 2: Cognitive performance of the two research groups.

Discussion

Because of nSLE, 25.6 percent of the population had cognitive impairment (32.1 percent in nSLE minus 6.5 percent in the control group). Those values are in accordance with those discovered in previous studies.

While there was a great deal of inter-individual variation in the pattern of cognitive impairment, when looking at the whole nSLE group, it seemed that all cognitive domains were damaged in the same manner across the board.

A possible explanation for previous assertions of severe memory impairment in SLE is an overrepresentation of memory scores in the selected batteries [16,17].

Three out of ten cognitive scores in the battery touched into learning capacity, for example by Monastero et al. [17] We also discovered, by a post-hoc analysis of the current data, that there is a statistically significant association between how many cognitive scores are present in each domain as well as the incidence of malfunction in that area (r=0.92, p-value 0.01). Even after controlling for factors such as age and education, a consistent association between cognitive impairment and less skilled job was discovered. Because long-term data were not available, the possibility of the reverse explanation (i.e. cognitive deterioration because of a less challenging job) could not be ruled out either. In a recent study, it was shown that patients with nSLE were more likely than rheumatoid arthritis patients to have impairments in occupational competence and social function [24].

Quantitative approaches for analyzing SPECT images that have recently been developed should aid in better understanding the processes of cognitive impairment in SLE. Furthermore, lupus anticoagulant has been associated to worse cognitive function in nSLE more specifically than anti-cardiolipin antibodies, which was not tested in our investigation [25,26].

In SLE, the relationship between mood disturbance, cognitive symptoms, and cognitive function is likely to be complicated and multifaceted [27]. Previously, investigations with non-selected individuals found a link between depressed symptoms and cognitive function [28], it seems that psychological responses to illness or other psychosocial variables are the most important predictors of cognitive symptoms in nSLE, according to the present research results. However, when compared to patients with other chronic diseases, two studies found that nSLE patients have a higher prevalence of cognitive complaints and psychological distress [24].

Conclusion

Finally, a number of interconnected elements (such as SLE-related factors, drugs, and psychosocial factors) seem to have a role in cognitive impairment and cognitive complaints in nSLE patients. Larger samples are required to definitively identify the associated chemicals and processes, and this venture might considerably enhance the afflicted people's quality of life.

Funding Source

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Permission

It was taken from the ethical review committee of the institute.

References

  1. Firestein GS, Budd RC, Gabriel SE, et alR. Kelley and firestein's textbook of rheumatology e-book: Elsevier Health Sciences 2016.
  2. Google scholar

  3. Bruns A, Meyer O. Neuropsychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Joint Bone Spine 2006; 73:639-645.
  4. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  5. Feinglass EJ, Arnett FC, Dorsch CA, et al. Neuropsychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus: Diagnosis, clinical spectrum, and relationship to other features of the disease. Medicine 1976; 55:323-339.
  6. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  7. Ainiala H, Loukkola J, Peltola J, et al. The prevalence of neuropsychiatric syndromes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Neurology 2001; 57:496-500.
  8. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  9. Denburg SD, Denburg JA, Carbotte RM, et al. Cognitive deficits in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1993; 19:815-831.
  10. Google scholar, Cross Ref

  11. Bluestein HG, Williams GW, Steinberg AD. Cerebrospinal fluid antibodies to neuronal cells: Association with neuropsychiatric manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Med 1981; 70:240-246.
  12. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  13. https://www.elsevier.com/books/dubois-lupus-erythematosus-and-related-syndromes/wallace/978-0-323-47927-1
  14. Prabu V, Rajasekhar L, Suvarna A, et al. O7 severity of cognitive impairment in SLE is related to disease activity: Single center case control study. Indian J Rheumatol 2010; 3:S4.
  15. Google scholar, Cross Ref

  16. Conti F, Alessandri C, Perricone C, et al. Neurocognitive dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus: association with antiphospholipid antibodies, disease activity and chronic damage. PloS One 2012; 7:e33824.
  17. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  18. Vickers NJ. Animal communication: When i’m calling you, will you answer too? Curr Biol 2017; 27:R713-5.
  19. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  20. Caine JA, Coburn J. Multifunctional and redundant roles of Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface proteins in tissue adhesion, colonization, and complement evasion. Frontiers Immunol 2016; 7:442.
  21. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  22. Bahrehmand F, Vaisi-Raygani A, Kiani A, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 polymorphisms and systemic lupus erythematosus: Correlation with systemic inflammatory markers and oxidative stress. Lupus 2015; 24:597-605.
  23. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  24. Baqai T, Isenberg DA, Ioannou Y. Pathogenesis of neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric manifestations in childhood-onset lupus: an overview. Rheumatol Reports 2013; 5:e6.
  25. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  26. Carbotte RM, Denburg SD, Denburg JA. Prevalence of cognitive impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Nerv Ment Dis 1986.
  27. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  28. How A, Dent PB, Liao SK, et al. Antineuronal antibodies in neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1985; 28:789-795.
  29. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  30. Kozora E, Thompson LL, West SG, et al. Analysis of cognitive and psychological deficits in systemic lupus erythematosus patients without overt central nervous system disease. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 39:2035-2045.
  31. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  32. Monastero R, Bettini P, Del Zotto E, et al. Prevalence and pattern of cognitive impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with and without overt neuropsychiatric manifestations. J Neurol Sci 2001; 184:33-39.
  33. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  34. Loukkola J, Laine M, Ainiala H, et al. Cognitive impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus and neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus: A population-based neuropsychological study. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2003; 25:145-51.
  35. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  36. Hay EM, Black D, Huddy A, et al. Psychiatric disorder and cognitive impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 35:411-416.
  37. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  38. Glanz BI, Slonim D, Urowitz MB, et al. Pattern of neuropsychologic dysfunction in inactive systemic lupus erythematosus. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1997.
  39. Indexed at, Google scholar

  40. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW, et al. Neuropsychological assessment. Oxford University Press, USA 2004.
  41. Google scholar

  42. Tan EM, Cohen AS, Fries JF, et al. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1982; 25:1271-1277.
  43. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  44. Liang MH, Corzillius M, Bae SC, et al. The American College of Rheumatology nomenclature and case definitions for neuropsychiatric lupus syndromes. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42:599-608.
  45. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  46. Ginsburg KS, Wright EA, Larson MG, et al. A controlled study of the prevalence of cognitive dysfunction in randomly selected patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1992; 35:776-782.
  47. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  48. Leritz E, Brandt J, Minor M, et al. Neuropsychological functioning and its relationship to antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2002; 24:527-533.
  49. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  50. Denburg SD, Carbotte RM, Denburg JA. Corticosteroids and neuropsychological functioning in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 1994; 37:1311-1320.
  51. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

  52. Denburg SD, Carbotte RM, Denburg JA. Psychological aspects of systemic lupus erythematosus: cognitive function, mood, and self-report. J Rheumatol 1997; 24:998-1003.
  53. Indexed at

  54. Waterloo K, Omdal R, Mellgren SI, et al. Neuropsychological functions in systemic lupus erythematosus: A comparison with chronic whiplash patients. Eur J Neurol 1997; 4:171-177.
  55. Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Author Info

Muhammad Amjad Kalhoro1*, Mehwish Abrar2, Shahtaj Adil Shah3, Safia Bano4, Nisar Ahmed Khokhar5 and Mahesh Kumar6

1Assistant Professor Medicine, Bilawal Medical College Jamshoro, Pakistan
2Women Medical officer Medicine, Liaquat University of Medical Health and Sciences Jamshoro/Liaqaut University Hospital Hyderabad, Pakistan
3Jinnah Medical and Dental College Karachi, Pakistan
4Senior Registrar Medicine, Bilawal Medical College for boys LUMHS Jamshoro, Pakistan
5Professor Medicine, Bilawal Medical College for boys LUMHS Jamshoro, Pakistan
6Assistant Professor Medicine, Muhammad Medical College and Hospital Mirpurkhas, Pakistan
 

Received: 01-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. JRMDS-22-51568; , Pre QC No. JRMDS-22-51568 (PQ); Editor assigned: 03-Feb-2022, Pre QC No. JRMDS-22-51568 (PQ); Reviewed: 17-Feb-2022, QC No. JRMDS-22-51568; Revised: 21-Feb-2022, Manuscript No. JRMDS-22-51568 (R); Published: 28-Feb-2022

http://sacs17.amberton.edu/