Research - (2021) Volume 9, Issue 8
Assessment of Knowledge of GNM Students on STD/Aids in Karnataka
*Correspondence: AR Bharathi, Department of Nursing, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, India, Email:
Abstract
Background: This stigma and discrimination towards people living with HIV/STD it is high among health workers as well as the general population. Knowledge and specific information has an important role in HIV/AIDS prevention and the health workers have a central responsibility in prevention, care and treatment. Therefore it is important to assess knowledge and attitudes towards people living with HIV/AIDS among health professionals. Gained information can be used to direct educational programs. Objectives: To assess the level of knowledge of GNM students on STD/AIDS. Methods: A descriptive study approach and Cross sectional Descriptive design was used. Findings: Overall level of Knowledge score among III yr. GNM nursing students. Majority of the subjects had moderate level 545(54.4%). 400 (40.0%) had inadequate knowledge, and (55)5.5% of them were adequate level of knowledge. Study results showed that update and improve the level of the knowledge on STD/ AIDS. The data revealed that commonly found majority of them had moderate level of knowledge; the reason was that they would have got the information about STD/AIDS through curriculum and Media. Conclusion: Study results showed that update and improve the level of the knowledge on STD/ AIDS. The data revealed that commonly found majority of them had moderate level of knowledge; the reason was that they would have got the information about STD/AIDS through curriculum and Media.
Keywords
HIV, STD, Knowledge
Introduction
Since the 1980s, there has been a lot of debate around the origin of HIV. Here we discuss evidence about the origin of HIV, and find out how, when and where HIV first began to cause illness in humans. There are two types of HIV, known as HIV-1 and HIV-2, which have different origins and causes. The first AIDS case in India was detected in 1986and since then HIV infection has been reported in all states and union territories. India has the world's third largest population living with HIV/AIDS, with a prevalence rate of 2.3 million National AIDS Control Organisation / United Nations Program (NACO/ UNAIDS, 2007). This stigma and discrimination towards people living with HIV/STD it is high among health workers as well as the general population. Knowledge and specific information has an important role in HIV/AIDS prevention and the health workers have a central responsibility in prevention, care and treatment. Therefore it is important to assess knowledge and attitudes towards people living with HIV/AIDS among health professionals. Gained information can be used to direct educational programs. These infections may be spread through vaginal, anal and oral sex. There are at least 25 different STIs/STDs with a range of different symptoms. Most STIs or STDs will only affect you if you have sexual contact with someone who has an infection. However, some infections, for example scabies, are generally called STIs or STDs because they are most commonly transmitted sexually, but they can also be passed on in other ways (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Number of people living with HIV worldwide.
Funding the HIV response in India
Previously, efforts to tackle the HIV epidemic in India relied heavily on international funding. However, India has increasingly taken responsibility for financing its HIV response and in 2012, committed to financing 90% of its HIV and AIDS programmes. The vast majority (67%) of the NACP-III budget was spent on HIV prevention, with 17% going to treatment, care and support.
The future of HIV and AIDS in India
Over the past decade, India has made significant progress in tackling its HIV epidemic, especially in comparison with other countries in the region. For example, while new HIV infections have fallen by more than half since 2001, the number of new HIV cases in neighboring Pakistan has increased eight-fold. A major reason for the country's success has been the sustained commitment of the Indian government through its National AIDS Control Programme, which has been particularly effective at targeting high-risk groups such as MSM, sex workers and PWID. However, better HIV surveillance and targeted. A study in India to reduce HIV stigma among nursing students to assessing the involvement with regard to reduction of STD/AIDS related-stigma and discrimination have been documented. They explored nursing students’ perception about caring and communicating with HIV people in Greece and found discriminatory attitude to be prevalent among them. They reported 87% and 95% demonstrating intent to discriminate while dispensing medications and drawing blood, respectively. Furthermore and discriminatory attitude was found to be common among student nurses in Russia. A lack of STD/ AIDS-related stigma and discrimination reduction studies in the literature among student nurses in Nigeria has resulted in a knowledge gap. This study, therefore, focused on knowledge, attitude, and practice of HIV/ AIDS-related stigma and discrimination reduction among student nurses in southwest Nigeria.
This study was carried out for the assessment of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of GNM Students on STD/AIDS in Karnataka. So this is an attempt to understand how well our student nurses are prepared to tackle the situations effectively, with Knowledge, Attitude and Practice they are ready to go to clinical and community area. In view of the magnitude of the problem, the investigator felt that it would be more suitable for the diploma nursing students and by improving the level of knowledge and practice, it would be possible to bring about desirable attitudes on STD/ AIDS [1-10].
Materials and Methods
A descriptive study approach and Cross sectional Descriptive design was used. The study sample size were selected from ten schools of nursing out of 300 schools of nursing available at Karnataka. In that III year diploma student alone consider as a samples based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The sample size of the present study compressed of 1000 from ten different schools of nursing. Each of four zones (eg: North, East, West & South) in Bangalore, Karnataka District. All 10 schools of nursing are run by private management Formal permission from the principal/ head of the institution was obtained after proper explanation regarding the study. Each school of nursing had different intakes, but among that only 80-100 students were selected in each school of nursing, meeting inclusion & exclusion criteria
Systematic non probability purposive sampling technique was adopted for the collection of data. Structure questionnaire format having two divisions Such as, section I – Demographic variables, section - ii Knowledge assessment tool, They provided separate room with all the facilities, so study went on comfortably. All ten institutions were well arranged and the schedule could be planned without any interruption. This also gave an opportunity for the investigator to assess the III year GNM student’s level of knowledge, on STD/AIDS. The entire programme went on well with good co-operation from students as well as management along with all the nursing and non-nursing faculty members.
Inclusion criteria
Student who were willing to participate at time of study. Students of III Year GNM students at selected school of Nursing in Karnataka.
Exclusion criteria
Who were selected for pilot study not included? The knowledge assessment tool contains section–I, in general information of knowledge aspects. Such as definition, causes, transmission and confirmation test. Section–II treatment includes window period, opportunity infections, symptoms, any vaccination, any treatment, universal precautions and screening of STD/AIDS. Section – III, The knowledge on risk of getting infection coughing, sharing clothes and other personal items, and section–IV, knowledge related to STD/AIDS contains spreading AIDS, HIV testing, anti-retroviral drugs and side effects.
Results
In general the results show the level of knowledge among GNM students on AIDS / STD. I found three aspects of knowledge assessment as follows.
Table 1, reveals the distribution of GNM students' by have you attended the training on AIDS, the results revealed that that majority of subjects 92.0% were attended; lesser numbers only 8.0% were not attended. The reason for more attended is compulsory for the students and not attended was absence on the day.
S. No | Have you attended the training on AIDS | % |
---|---|---|
1 | Yes | 92.00% |
2 | No | 8.00% |
Table 1: Table-1 Have you attended the training on AIDS N=1000.
The picture exhibits the distribution of GNM students' by where did you burse an AIDS patients, majority 93.5% of them were working at Government hospital, Private and Community hospital were 4.0% and 2.5% respectively. Data revealed that commonly found majority of them were posted at Government Hospital. The reason is STD/ AIDS is a developing problem and also communicable disease (Figures 2 and Figure 3).
Figure 2. Frequencies and percentage distribution of have you attended the training on AIDS among III yr. GNM students.
Figure 3. Frequency and percentage distribution of where did you nurse AIDS patients among III yr. GNM Students.
Table 2, shows exhibits domain wise percentage of GNM nursing students' knowledge score distribution on STD/ AIDS. General information of STD/AIDS scored high with 583(53.8%). knowledge on clinical materials considers infective on STD/AIDS was least with 446 (44.6%).
Domains | No. Of Students | % |
---|---|---|
General information of STD/HIV/AIDS | 538 | 53.80% |
Knowledge on treatment /condom use age of STD/HIV/AIDS | 493 | 49.30% |
Knowledge on risk of getting infection | 456 | 45.60% |
Knowledge on which of the following clinical materials consider infective | 446 | 44.60% |
Knowledge related to STD/AIDS | 482 | 48.20% |
Overall Total | 483 | 48.30% |
Table 2: Each domain wise percentage of knowledge score N=1000.
Table 3, shows domain wise percentage of GNM nursing students' level of knowledge score distribution on STD/ AIDS. They had adequate knowledge on General information of STD/AIDS were 71, Moderate level of knowledge majority were 598 related to STD/AIDS high level of inadequate knowledge on Risk of getting infection of STD/AIDS. Study results showed that there was a need to update and improve level of the knowledge on STD/AI.
Level of Knowledge(N=1000) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Domains | Inadequate | Moderate | Adequate |
General information of STD/AIDS | 370 | 559 | 71 |
Treatment /condom use age of STD/AIDS | 410 | 530 | 60 |
Risk of getting infection | 466 | 494 | 40 |
Clinical materials consider infective | 408 | 544 | 48 |
Related to STD/AIDS | 346 | 598 | 56 |
Overall Total | 400 | 545 | 55 |
Table 3: Each domain wise level of knowledge score N=1000.
Table 4, shows overall level of Knowledge score among diploma nursing students. Majority of the subjects had moderate level 545(54.4%). 400 (40.0%) had inadequate knowledge, and (55)5.5% of them there was a need had adequate level of knowledge. Study results showed that update and improve the level of the knowledge on STD/ AIDS.
Level of knowledge | No. of students | % |
---|---|---|
Inadequate | 400 | 40.00% |
Moderate | 545 | 54.50% |
Adequate | 55 | 5.50% |
Total | 1000 | 100.00% |
Table 4: Overall level of knowledge on STD/AIDS N=1000.
Table 5, depicts the domain wise mean and Percentage distribution of Knowledge Score. The study result shows that for general information of STD/AIDS having ten questions, the mean value is 5.38 (53.8%). Treatment related questions were twenty one mean values 10.37(49.3%). Fourteen questions from risk of getting infection had the mean values 6.39(45.6%). Eleven questionnaires were affecting with clinical infections showed 4.91 mean values with 44.6%, and related to STD/AIDS contained fifteen questions mean values 7.23(48.2%). The above findings revealed that there were good in general information of STD/AIDS get they had to expand their knowledge on other aspects of STD/ AIDS.
Domains | No. of Questions | Mean Knowledge Score | % of Knowledge Score |
---|---|---|---|
General information of STD/AIDS | 10 | 5.38 | 53.80% |
Treatment /condom use age of STD/AIDS | 21 | 10.37 | 49.30% |
Risk of getting infection | 14 | 6.39 | 45.60% |
Clinical materials consider infective | 11 | 4.91 | 44.60% |
Related to STD/AIDS | 15 | 7.23 | 48.20% |
Total | 71 | 34.28 | 48.30% |
Table 5: Each domain wise mean knowledge score and percentage of knowledge score N=1000.
Table 6, infers the association between level of knowledge and their demographic variables. Age between 26 -30 yrs. Shows high percentage 68.0% (p=0.001***) Moderate level of knowledge. About sex male were having more Moderate level of knowledge 59.4 %( p=0.01**). Nuclear family shows more 56.6% (p=0.01**). Married people were moderately 61.1% (p=0.001***) in high level. People who are living at remote area have highly adequate level of knowledge 63.3% (p=0.02*).
level of knowledge | Total | Chi square test | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
inadequate | Moderate | Adequate | |||||||
n | % | n | % | n | % | ||||
Age | 16 -20 yrs | 335 | 39.90% | 466 | 55.50% | 39 | 4.60% | 840 | x2=20.84 p=0.001*** |
21 -25 yrs | 55 | 50.00% | 45 | 40.90% | 10 | 9.10% | 110 | ||
26 -30 yrs | 10 | 20.00% | 34 | 68.00% | 6 | 12.00% | 50 | ||
Sex | Male | 55 | 29.70% | 110 | 59.40% | 20 | 10.80% | 185 | x2=18.65 p=0.01** |
Female | 345 | 42.30% | 435 | 53.40% | 35 | 4.30% | 815 | ||
Education | Diploma in nursing | 400 | 40.00% | 545 | 54.50% | 55 | 5.50% | 1000 | x2=0.00 p=1.00 |
Institution | Private | 400 | 40.00% | 545 | 54.50% | 55 | 5.50% | 1000 | x2=0.00 p=1.00 |
Category of nurse | Student nurse | 400 | 40.00% | 545 | 54.50% | 55 | 5.50% | 1000 | x2=0.00 p=1.00 |
Experience | Both | 400 | 40.00% | 545 | 54.50% | 55 | 5.50% | 1000 | x2=0.00 p=1.00 |
Type of family | Nuclear family | 265 | 37.10% | 405 | 56.60% | 45 | 6.30% | 715 | x2=10.40 p=0.01** |
Joint family | 135 | 47.40% | 140 | 49.10% | 10 | 3.50% | 285 | ||
Religion | Christian | 275 | 41.00% | 354 | 52.80% | 41 | 6.20% | 670 | x2=10.22 p=0.11 |
Hindu | 60 | 32.40% | 118 | 63.80% | 7 | 3.80% | 185 | ||
Muslim | 50 | 45.50% | 56 | 50.90% | 4 | 3.60% | 110 | ||
Others | 15 | 42.90% | 17 | 48.60% | 3 | 8.50% | 35 | ||
Marital | Single | 378 | 41.50% | 490 | 53.80% | 42 | 4.70% | 910 | x2=21.16p=0.001*** |
Married | 22 | 24.40% | 55 | 61.10% | 13 | 14.40% | 90 | ||
Residential area | Urban | 123 | 24.60% | 331 | 66.20% | 46 | 9.20% | 500 | x2=11.71p=0.02* |
Rural | 220 | 53.70% | 185 | 45.10% | 5 | 1.20% | 410 | ||
Remote | 57 | 63.30% | 29 | 32.20% | 4 | 4.50% | 90 | ||
Dietary pattern | Vegetarian | 89 | 37.10% | 131 | 54.60% | 20 | 8.30% | 240 | x2=5.28p=0.07 |
Non Vegetarian | 311 | 40.90% | 414 | 54.50% | 35 | 4.60% | 760 | ||
* Significant at P:50.05 | |||||||||
** highly significant at P:50.01 | |||||||||
*** very high significant at P:50.001 |
Table 6: Association between level of knowledge and their demographic variables N=1000.
Table 7, shows the association between level of knowledge and their clinical experience variables. Knows by all modes, training attended students, more than 2 days attended and 2 months before attended are having more knowledge than others. Statistical significance was calculated using chi square test.
Level of knowledge | Total | Chi square test | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
inadequate | Moderate | Adequate | |||||||
n | % | n | % | n | % | ||||
Hospital Current in training | Private | 400 | 40.00% | 545 | 54.50% | 55 | 5.50% | 1000 | x2=0.00p=1.00 |
Department current working in | OBG in Nursing | 250 | 40.90% | 325 | 53.30% | 35 | 5.70% | 610 | x2=1.20p=0.54 |
Community health Nursing | 150 | 38.50% | 220 | 56.40% | 20 | 5.20% | 390 | ||
Have you hear of the disease AIDS | Yes | 400 | 40.00% | 545 | 54.50% | 55 | 5.50% | 1000 | x2=0.00p=1.00 |
If yes, where did you come to know of it? | Radio , News Paper, Magazine, Films, Friends, Doctors, Pamp | 318 | 37.60% | 480 | 56.80% | 47 | 5.60% | 845 | x2=13.33p=0.01** |
Medical Journals Nursing Curriculum | 72 | 72.00% | 23 | 23.00% | 5 | 5.00% | 100 | ||
All | 10 | 18.20% | 42 | 76.40% | 3 | 5.40% | 55 | ||
Have you seen on AIDS patient? | Yes | 400 | 40.00% | 545 | 54.50% | 55 | 5.50% | 1000 | x2=0.00p=1.00 |
If yes, have you nursed an AIDS patient? | Yes | 400 | 40.00% | 545 | 54.50% | 55 | 5.50% | 1000 | x2=0.00p=1.00 |
Where did you nurse an AIDS patient? | Government Hospital | 378 | 40.40% | 508 | 54.30% | 49 | 5.30% | 935 | x2=4.03p=0.41 |
Private Hospital | 12 | 30.00% | 25 | 62.50% | 3 | 7.50% | 40 | ||
Community | 10 | 40.00% | 12 | 48.00% | 3 | 12.00% | 25 | ||
Have you attended the training on AIDS? | Yes | 355 | 38.60% | 512 | 55.60% | 53 | 5.80% | 920 | x2=9.21p=0.01** |
No | 45 | 56.30% | 33 | 41.30% | 2 | 2.40% | 80 | ||
If Yes where did you attended the training on AIDS? | Govt- Organization | 265 | 42.40% | 334 | 53.40% | 26 | 4.20% | 625 | x2=17.72p=0.001** * |
Non Govt- Organization | 90 | 30.50% | 178 | 60.30% | 27 | 9.20% | 295 | ||
Duration of the programme? | 1 day | 265 | 42.40% | 334 | 53.40% | 26 | 4.20% | 625 | x2=17.72p=0.001 ** * |
More than 2 days | 90 | 30.50% | 178 | 60.30% | 27 | 9.20% | 295 | ||
When did you attend the training Programme? | 4 month before | 265 | 42.40% | 334 | 53.40% | 26 | 4.20% | 625 | x2=17.72p=0.001** * |
Table 7: Association between level of knowledge and their clinical experience variables N=1000.
Table 8, exhibits the association between level of knowledge and their demographic variables. Age 26-30 yrs were good knowledge 80.0% (p=0.01**), male sex were 70.3% (p=0.001***), come to know about AIDS through Radio, News Paper, Magazine, Films, Friends, and Doctors, 66.5% (p=0.001***) married people shows 75.6% (p=0.001***), living at urban area 75.4% (p=0.001***), 61.4% (p=0.001***) were attend the training on AIDS programme. Attended the training on AIDS maximum in Non-Government-Organization 69.5% (p=0.001***), more than 2 days training and 2 months before training attended are having more knowledge and equally 69.5% (p=0.001***) than others. The above information shows statistical significance.
Demographic variables | Level of knowledge | N | Chi square test | OR with 95% CI | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
inadequate | Moderate/good | |||||||
n | % | n | % | |||||
Age | 16-25 yrs | 390 | 41.00% | 560 | 59.00% | 950 | c2=8.77 | 2.8 (1.3-6.0) |
26-30 yrs | 10 | 20.00% | 40 | 80.00% | 50 | p=0.01** | ||
Sex | Male | 55 | 29.70% | 135 | 70.30% | 185 | c2=11.94 | 1.8 (1.3 – 2.6) |
Female | 345 | 42.30% | 465 | 57.70% | 815 | p=0.001*** | ||
Type of family | Nuclear family | 265 | 37.10% | 450 | 62.90% | 715 | c2=9.02 | 1.5 (1.2 – 2.1) |
Extended family | 135 | 47.40% | 150 | 52.60% | 285 | p=0.01** | ||
Marital status | Single | 378 | 41.50% | 532 | 58.40% | 910 | c2=9.97 | 2.2 (1.3 – 3.7) |
Married | 22 | 24.40% | 68 | 75.60% | 90 | p=0.001*** | ||
Residential area | Urban | 123 | 24.60% | 377 | 75.40% | 500 | c2=28.88 | 3.8 (2.9-5.0) |
Rural | 277 | 55.40% | 223 | 44.60% | 500 | p=0.001*** | ||
If yes, where did you come to know of it? | Radio, News Paper, Magazine, Films, Friends, Doctors, Pamp | 318 | 33.50% | 527 | 66.50% | 845 | c2=12.73 | 1.9 (1.3-2.7) |
Medical Journals Nursing Curriculum | 82 | 52.90% | 73 | 47.10% | 155 | p=0.001*** | ||
Have you attended the training on AIDS? | Yes | 355 | 38.60% | 565 | 61.40% | 920 | c2=9.57 | 1.9 (1.3-2.7) |
No | 45 | 56.30% | 35 | 43.70% | 80 | p=0.001*** | ||
If Yes where did you attend the training on AIDS? | Govt- Organization | 265 | 42.40% | 360 | 57.60% | 625 | c2=11.96 | 1.7 (1.2 – 2.3) |
Non Govt- Organization | 90 | 30.50% | 205 | 69.50% | 295 | p=0.001*** | ||
Duration of the programme? | 1 day | 265 | 42.40% | 360 | 57.60% | 625 | c2=11.96 | 1.7 (1.2 – 2.3) |
More than 2 days | 90 | 30.50% | 205 | 69.50% | 295 | p=0.001*** | ||
When did you attend the training Programme? | 4 month before | 265 | 42.40% | 360 | 57.60% | 625 | c2=11.96 | 1.7 (1.2 – 2.3) |
2 month before | 90 | 30.50% | 205 | 69.50% | 295 | p=0.001*** | ||
**significant at P≤0.05 | ||||||||
** highly significant at P≤0.01 | ||||||||
*** very high significant at |
Table 8: Association between level of knowledge and odds ratio of demographic /clinical experience variables N=1000.
Table 9, exhibits the Univar ate analysis Elder, male, nuclear family, married, urban, radio , training on AIDS, non Govt organization, more than 2days training and 2 months before training Multivariate analysis of logistic identifies male, married, urban and training on AIDS are influencing factors for getting more knowledge score than others.
Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
p-value | Unadjusted OR( 95 % CI) | p-value | Adjusted OR(95%CI) | |
Age(26-30Vs 16-25 yrs) | 0.01** | 2.8(1.3 - 6.0) | 0.16 | 1.7(0.86 – 2.6) |
Type of family(Urban vs Rural) | 0.01** | 1.5( 1.2 – 2.1) | 0.33 | 1.2(0.8 -3.3) |
Sex( Male Vs Female) | 0.001 | 1.8(1.3 – 2.6) | 0.001** | 1.7 (1.1 - 7.7) |
Maritalstatus(Married Vs | 0.001*** | 2.2(1.3 – 3.7) | 0.01** | 2.0 (1.2 -10.3) |
Residence (Urban Vs< Rural) | 0.001*** | 3.8(2.9 - 5.0) | 0.001** | 2.7(1.2 – 9.5) |
Training on AIDS(Yes Vs No) | 0.001*** | 1.9( 1. 3- 2.7) | 0.05** | 1.6. |
If yes, where did you come to know of it? (radio& others Vs journal) | 0.001*** | 1.9( 1. 3- 2.7) | 0.1 | 1.4(0.4 – 12.7) |
If Yes where did youattend the training on AIDS (NGO Vs GO)? | 0.001*** | 1.7(1.2 – 2.3) | 0.2 | 1.2(0.9 -8.9) |
Durationofthe programme (>2 days Vs 1 day) | 0.001*** | 1.7(1.2 – 2.3) | 0.2 | 1.2(0.9 -8.9) |
When did you attend the training Programme(2 month before Vs before 4 months)? | 0.001*** | 1.7(1.2 – 2.3) | 0.2 | 1.2(0.9 -8.9) |
Table 9: Identification of influencing factors for knowledge gain using multivariate logistic regression N=1000.
Discussion
Major findings of the study
Overall level of Knowledge score among III yr. GNM nursing students. Majority of the subjects had moderate level 545(54.4%). 400 (40.0%) had inadequate knowledge, and (55)5.5% of them were adequate level of knowledge. Study results showed that update and improve the level of the knowledge on STD/ AIDS. The data revealed that commonly found majority of them had moderate level of knowledge, the reason was that they would have got the information about STD/AIDS through curriculum and Media. This association is compared to the level of knowledge, adequate knowledge was significantly less, majority of them were moderately significant. Because they are not adequately exposed to clinical field and allow to work with experienced people in field and their knowledge is widely updated due to exposure to mass media, internet and library and interaction with expert from field. The stated research hypotheses (H1) are not accepted.
The above findings were consistent with the study conducted by previous authors; a study was conducted to assess German nursing students' knowledge of and attitudes to HIV and AIDS: The results indicated that the nursing students had a rather high knowledge level concerning AIDS. It was concluded that students having positive attitudes towards people with AIDS had less homophobia compared with those having negative attitudes towards persons suffering from AIDS. The students having a high AIDS knowledge level tended less towards negative attitudes and homophobia than those with a low level of knowledge.
Implication
Nursing practice
Effective clinical management of HIV/AIDS clients/ patients will be achieved when the nursing practice area will provide opportunity for the nurses’ knowledge to all aspects regarding HIV/AIDS which reflect the following areas to be clearly understood by the practicing nurses: prevention for contracting HIV infection, natural history of HIV infection, application of the nursing process, counselling skills and confidentiality/stigma.
Nurses can plane for educational program me to create awareness on STD/AIDS to school children, because nurses are more responsibility.
Nursing education
Nursing education training in both nursing schools and on job training opportunities should aim at addressing effectively prevention for contracting HIV infection, natural history of HIV infection, application of the nursing process, counselling skills and confidentiality/ stigma, including provision of adequate information about the available drugs and their mechanism of action, side effects, measures to deal with reactions/ complications related to use of ant-retroviral drugs.
Nursing research
A wider range and extensive research study is needed to signify generalization of the findings which will provide opportunity for establishing appropriate measures aimed to ensure that nurses become equipped with adequate knowledge and skills pertinent for the clinical management of HIV/AIDS clients/patients.
Nursing administration
Administrator can arrange for special funds for this programme.
They can arrange special training programme, visits, seminars, guest lectures and conferences for staff nurses and students [11-14].
Limitations
• Who is available only included in this study.
• Samples only from final year GNM students, available at the time of study in selected schools of nursing, Karnataka.
• Study was limited to 1000 samples.
Recommendations
• The investigator draws the following recommendations from the research study which would increases the knowledge, practice and attitude among GNM student nurses on STD/AIDS.
• The nurse investigator recommends the effective utilization of the knowledge, practice and attitude towards STD/HIV patients.
• The nurse investigator recommends the comparison of the knowledge, practice and attitude towards STD/HIV patients.
Conclusion
The study showed a fair level of knowledge among all health care professionals, with the highest knowledge among the doctors and the lowest among laboratory workers and a significant gender difference in the level of knowledge, though the data suggested that this did not differ by hospital settings. There were generally negative feelings and views about the care of HIV/AIDS patients across all HCP but worst at the CHC and best at the Government Hospital. The greatest source of information for the majority of professionals was health talks/ seminars, and those respondents who got their information from school scored the highest on the items on general knowledge of HIV/AIDS incidence, cause, transmission, and clinical treatment.
Funding
No funding sources.
Ethical Approval
The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The encouragement and support from Bharath University, Chennai is gratefully acknowledged. For providing the laboratory facilities to carry out the research work.
References
- Ruma MM. Knowledge and awareness of HIV/AIDS among some senior secondary school students in Katsina, Nigeria. Bayero J Pure App Sci 2009; 2:121-6.
- Zhao Q, Li X, Stanton B, et al. HIV/AIDS awareness and knowledge among secondary school students in China. World Health Population 2010; 11:38.
- Shankar PR, Subish P, Paudel R, et al. Perception and knowledge about HIV/AIDS among students in a medical college in Western Nepal. J Tuberculosis Lung Dis HIV/AIDS 2009; 6:11-6.
- Nsuami JM, Sanders LS, Taylor SN. Knowledge of sexually transmitted infections among high school students. Am J Health Educ 2010; 41:206-17.
- Van Rossem R, Berten H, Van Tuyckom C. AIDS knowledge and sexual activity among Flemish secondary school students: A multilevel analysis of the effects of type of education. BMC Public Health 2010; 10:1-0.
- Mahat G, Eller LS. HIV/AIDS and universal precautions: Knowledge and attitudes of Nepalese nursing students. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65:1907-15.
- Ram Sharan Mehta. Knowledge about HIV/AIDS among nurses, Koirala institute of health sciences Nepal. J Health Med 2012.
- Akin S, Mendi B, Mendi O, et al. Turkish nursing students' knowledge of and attitudes towards patients with HIV/AIDS. J Clin Nurs 2013; 22:3361-71.
- Neide de Souza Praça. Students enrolled in the nursing undergraduate course at a public university of Sao Paulo state, Brazil. Online Brazilian J Nurs 2013; 12.
- www.avert.org
- www.unaids.org
- https://www.healthline.com/health/hiv-aids
- https://www.theglobalfund.org/en/
- www.amfar.org
Author Info
Department of Nursing, Bharath Institute of Higher Education and Research, Selaiyur, Chennai-600073 Tamil Nadu, IndiaCitation: AR Bharathi, Assessment of Knowledge of GNM Students on STD/Aids in Karnataka, J Res Med Dent Sci, 2021, 9(8): 111-119
Received: 19-Jul-2021 Accepted: 10-Aug-2021