Histopathological Association with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding by Using Diagnostic Hysteroscopy
Author(s): Neranjana D and Jayalakshmi G*
Abstract
The outcomes of hysteroscopy and curettage were in accord in 82 percent of the participants in this study. In 12% of cases, hysteroscopy showed more evidence than curettage, and curettage provided more detail than hysteroscopy in 6% of instances. A total of 50 individuals with Unusual Uterine Bleeding had a panoramic hysteroscopy and curettage procedure. When analyzing irregular uterine bleeding, today’s modern gynecologist is concerned about missing a major malignant lesion. If we conform to the criteria for a poor hysteroscopy examination, the odds of missing such a lesion are slim, and no further examination is usually required. Even if the hysteroscopy view is negative, it is important to take endometrial samples for histological analysis, especially in peri or post-menopausal individuals.